|  CONTACT  |  
FR  |  EN
  CONTACT  |  
FR  |  EN

Definition of the 3Rs principle

The 3Rs principle defines the guidelines for an ethical approach to the use of animals for scientific purposes. It is based on 3 simple and fundamental rules, taken into account in the regulations and constantly adjusted to the technological and societal reality of the moment.

REPLACE

Use methods that replace the use of animals.

REDUCE

Limit the number of animals used to achieve a given scientific objective.

REFINE

Ensure and enhance animal welfare.

Processing

From the conception of a project and before any use of animals for scientific purposes, researchers must consider how to integrate the 3Rs principle and systematically reflect on the application of each of the 3Rs.


© FC3R and La chaire du bien être animal - Animal welfare and experimentation - The 3Rs principle - Download the poster in PDF (A3 format, A0 format)

The origin of the principle

The 3Rs principle originated from the ethical reflection of two British biologists, William Russel and Rex Burch. In their book “The principles of humane experimental technique”, published in 1959, they presented for the first time the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement, aiming to obtain experimental techniques that do not cause suffering to animals and that take their well-being into account.

This reasoning marks the birth of the 3Rs principle, now recognized as an ethical approach at the international level. It is the basis for national and European regulations on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, as well as for the creation of reference centers dedicated to the 3Rs.

The 3Rs, a philosophy that adapts to the times

Since the publication of the founding book of the historic 3Rs principle in 1959, the scientific community has become more aware of the need to use animals for scientific purposes in a more ethical manner. The initial ethical framework is based on a benefit/cost balance: the benefits of research to science and society should be as great as possible, while the costs to the animals should be minimized or eliminated altogether. Thus, all research must take into account animal welfare, have scientific value and be in line with society's expectations.

The 3Rs philosophy underlies aspects that have emerged from societal reflection and context, such as the principle of “Responsibility” of the experimenter towards the animal, or that of “Replacement”, which consists of avoiding killing when possible.


© Darwin microfluidics (microfluidic chip), Norm Barker et Dr. Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue (zebrafish embryos), Yu-Chan Chen (mouse)

Strech et Dirnagl propose adding three additional R's that are important to scientific value and quality. “Robustness” requires that any experimentation generate reliable results. This requires, among other things, the choice of the most appropriate model, the optimization of the experimental design and also the consideration of biological and environmental variability factors.

The notions of “Referencing” and “Reporting” encourage full and transparent communication. Systematic referencing of experimental studies is a good way to record them comprehensively. In addition, systematic and thorough reporting, including publication of unpublished or negative data, would limit unnecessary repetition.

3Rs reference centers around the world

Several countries have a reference center for all questions related to the 3Rs in public and private research. In France, FC3R is the contact point.

3Rs centers in the world

Submit
a training

Submit
a Short Note